Recently a friend gave me the opportunity to weigh in on their (cigarette) smoking habit, ergo, I credit/blame them for this piece, a piece for which I expect a strong response:
The phone rang, I answered, “Hello?”
“Hey. So... I was wondering if I could get your perspective on something?”“Shoot.”
“So, I’m trying to quit smoking and I was wondering whether I should just go cold-turkey or do the patch.”
“Hmm...” I was in bed, on the verge of sleep, watching Twin Peaks, i.e., neither fully functioning nor fully clothed (which, for yours truly, tend to go hand-in-hand). “Well, uh, if you quit cold-turkey then you’ve kind’a gott’a confront the thing head-on, which I like, whereas the patch just kind’a breaks the chemical addiction without necessarily forcing you to confront the psychological part, at least not initially, and so, like, with the patch you could quit without any pain, which I don’t like, but eventually you’re gonn’a have to confront the psychological part of the addiction, which quiting cold-turkey forces you to address head-on, which I like.”
“Yeah...”
“But then, if you’re gonn’a quit cold-turkey and you’re actually gonn’a make it stick you’re probably gonn’a need a reason, you know, a reason to not smoke, and, you know, it had better not be me because I’ve told you that I don’t mind the smell or the taste and you can’t do it just to make me happy and you can’t do it for me because, like, what if we break up, then are you just gonn’a start smoking again?”
“Good point.”
“So, what’s your reason?”
“I don’t know.”“Well, why don’t you think about that and get back to me.”
“OK, I will...” (End pertinent part of conversation.)
The next morning I texted my friend, “So, did you find a reason?”
They responded, via text, “Drinking coffee, reading, smoking, so, no.”In light of the fact that it was morning and I was fully-functioning (and fully-clothed), my thinking cap was on and I decided to try and come up with my reason for not smoking, which I’d never really had to fully articulate before and which I felt inclined to do then and there because of my friend’s inability or unwillingness to come up with one for herself.
Here’s what I came up with:
The reason I don’t smoke is because I want to do everything within my power to ensure that I will be able to be there for people in the future, and smoking is something that I know detracts from my ability to be there for people in the future, ergo, I don’t smoke.
My reason for not smoking literally came to me like “poof”, but the old noggin’ wasn’t done yet because immediately after I came up with my reason I also figured out what I basically understand smoking to be about: It’s about accountability, and smokers don’t hold themselves accountable to anybody other than themselves.
Before y’all jump down my admittedly harsh judgement’s throat, the following is sort’a-kind’a the train of thought that lead to my “Smokers don’t hold themselves accountable to other people” (although it’s hard to duplicate, hence the “sort’a-kind’a”):
The reason why my reason is my reason is because I try and hold myself accountable to other people; that’s what being able to be there for others is all about, it’s about accountability.
What did/do I mean by accountability? For starters, I mean doing that which is within your power to ensure that you can Be There for people (which is a different thing than actually being there, which I think has more to do with loyalty and fidelity, which is another topic for another time). For example, not smoking, wearing your seat-belt, wearing your bike-helmet, getting relatively regular exercise and eating in such a way that you don’t jeopardize your health, these are all things that you can do in order to try and make sure that you can be there fore people in the future.
By accountability I also mean doing everything within your power to make it possible for others reach you, e.g., having a cellphone or mailbox or address via which you can actually and dependably be reached by others such that you can actually respond when people need you to respond. (Part and parcel to this aspect of accountability seems to be having a grasp on the language in which others might try to reach you such that you’re actually in a position to be able to respond, but this, too, is another topic for another time.)
Another part of what I mean by accountability involves checking in and letting people know “What’s Up,” such as in the event of an impending trip out of the country or address change. Case in point, I’m planning to move to NYC this coming fall in order to pursue writing as a profession, and my brother, Griffin, might be joining me, and if you have any questions about this recently developed plan of mine I encourage you to ask them so that I might be able to explain myself to you (my phone number and email/blog addresses and facebook page will all be remaining the same, fyi).
The final piece of my definition of accountability involves not just doing what you want to do merely because you want to do it, or, if you are going to do what you want to do merely because you want to do it, doing your best to provide an account to others of your motivations/reasoning and be ready/willing to answer questions to those effects.
I now encourage you, dear reader, to take a moment to think about the people you know who smoke--which could quite possibly include you--and ask yourself whether or not they’re people who do a good job holding themselves accountable to people other than themselves. Here’s my own personal list of the smokers in my life:
My mother. During the last two years she’s been in and out of the state of Oregon more times than, well, it’s a large number (I feel like there’s a missed joke opportunity here and if anyone can remedy it I’ll be much obliged). For the last two years she’s also been a smoker. A few weeks ago she went to Florida in order to get more sunshine and run a car-wash with her hubby (Dick), leaving all her friends and most of her family behind for what will supposedly be a period of no less than five years.
One of my best and oldest friends (you know who you are!). Not all that good at accountability (although I know he’s working on it), i.e., he struggles to show up to stuff, struggles to return phone calls in a timely fashion, and has been notoriously flaky for almost as long as he’s been a...
My friend from the conversation above. Admittedly--as in, has admitted to me both before and after the above conversation and what it precipitated--hasn’t held themselves accountable to anyone other than themselves and has done what they wanted whenever they wanted for, like, the last four years, during which time--and I know I’m about to make a sizeable leap into what might seem to be a topic totally unrelated to accountability--every single one of their romantic relationships has been exciting but meaningless. Hmm...
Now, the above are only three of the, like, two-billion smokers the world over and, as another good friend of mine pointed out with an INCREDIBLY BOTHERSOME empirical counter-argument (the bane of a philosopher’s existence), it isn’t totally impossible for someone who smokes to be the sort of person that also does a really good job actually being there for people, which, I think is ultimately what’s most important if we’re talking about accountability. However, I still hold that it is impossible for someone who smokes to say that they do everything within their power to ensure that they will continue to be able to be there for people in the future. And that’s ultimately my point.
So, here’s the titular question: To smoke or not to smoke? And please, put aside all the fluffy little aesthetic arguments (e.g., it ages your skin and/or makes your mouth taste like, well, an ashtray).
You should not smoke if you hold yourself accountable to others and, via the definition of accountability laid out above, try to do everything within your power to be able to be there for others and understand that the primary condition for being able to be there and respond and, hopefully, actually show up to stuff is that you actually be alive and kicking, so to speak, and that smoking is something that you know damn well does absolutely nothing to help the cause of being alive and kicking and being able to be there for people. Not. A. Damn. Thing. If you know this to be true and you still smoke then my suggestion is: CUT THAT SH*T OUT.
One should smoke if one does not hold themselves accountable to anyone other than themselves.
This is facking hilarious. Although I do not disagree entirely with the logic here, I do find the entire rant laughable (which you knew already because I literally laughed in your face when you told me it the first time around). The fact of the matter is: that you can be a total flake in life with or without a cigarette in your mouth. And you can be a totally stand-up dude/chica with or without a cigarette in your mouth; and that accountability really has nothing to do with choosing to put a cigarette in your mouth.
ReplyDeleteThe conclusion, it seems, was reached based on a very limited number of people that you know who are basically flaky smokers. The reasoning, it seems, was arrived at after the fact, as a logicians way of legitimizing the experiential correlation that you found. I, on the other hand, do not/can not find the same correlation amongst my close friends who are smokers.
The human condition is a finite one meaning that we will all die at some point. In fact, from the day we are born, it would not be fully unreasonable to say that on that day we have embarked on a path towards death (the only absolutely certain thing in our condition). All of us do things that are not healthy for us and things that can potentially kill us (riding a bicycle in traffic, driving a car, riding in airplanes, jumping out of them, trying to do a backflip when we admittedly don't know how to do backflips in order to impress someone and then land on our heads (on concrete) because we admittedly do not know how to do backflips (this is both metaphorical and I know a guy who did this one time). I say that we do these things, risky, unhealthy things: may we call them "playing with fire"? because we must! It is part of the human condition. It might also be called the Promethean complex and it has more to do with our specific condition as finite beings in this world than it does with accountability. According to this logic, however, accountability to others is fake: a sham if you will; it is something that we pretend we can do for one another, because we value safety, and loyalty, and sharing experiences with one another, and love; and we don't value loneliness, flakiness, risky behavior, and death in the same way, even though all of these things are part of the human condition and deserve to be acknowledged as such. This is a ramble now, but what blog isn't? My point is that the finite human condition and the Promethean complex are in direct opposition to Royal's conception of accountability, and although he has a point that one can make reasonable choices that give them a seemingly higher probability to be accountable to others, we should acknowledge the fact that none of us really knows whether we will be able to be accountable to others tomorrow because we may in fact die tomorrow. Can we say that smokers, more than non-smokers, recognize this fact and act accordingly? I don't think so. However, I would be willing to say that smokers embody/embrace the Promethean complex more than non-smokers.
Does this make sense? ahh who cares...it does to me.
--Written by a non-smoker, who may decide to take up smoking.
"However, I still hold that it is impossible for someone who smokes to say that they do everything within their power to ensure that they will continue to be able to be there for people in the future. And that’s ultimately my point."
ReplyDelete--If you can DENY this Tito, then by all means please do. This is a quote from above.
Tito,
ReplyDeleteAnd we cannot claim or tell anyone that we're going to be there forever because, like you pointed out, we're finite and going to die. However, we can tell people that do what we can within our power to ensure that we will be able to be there for them in the future and smoking is something which DIRECTLY and UNDENIABLY harms ones ability to say this with a straight-face/good-conscience.
I have to agree with this. Your logic is undeniable good sir!
ReplyDeleteI am suprised that no one else has given you any flack over this.
ReplyDeleteHave you read Parfit's Reasons and Persons on personal identity and ethics? That sounds highfalutin but oh gosh is it relevant and revisionary.
ReplyDelete